A8-3850 vs Core i5-4350U

A8-3850 vs Core i5-4350U Performance Spectrum

A8-3850

4 / 4

2,421

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4350U

2 / 4

2,425

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3850 vs Core i5-4350U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3850 vs Core i5-4350U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3850

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6550D, while Core i5-4350U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4350U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,421 vs 2,425).

Core i5-4350U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-3850.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4350U better than A8-3850?

Yes. Core i5-4350U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4350U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4350U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4350U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4350U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3850 vs Core i5-4350U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3850

The A8-3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,421 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-4350U

The Core i5-4350U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,425 points. Launch price was $342.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4350U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A8-3850 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-4350U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A8-3850 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4350U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3850 scores 2,421 against the Core i5-4350U's 2,425 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-4350U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3850 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4350U.

Feature	A8-3850	Core i5-4350U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+107%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,421	2,425
Geekbench 6 Single	363	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3850 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4350U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-3850	Core i5-4350U
Socket	FM1	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3850) / not specified (Core i5-4350U). The A8-3850 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Core i5-4350U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3850 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3850 rivals Core i3-2105.