A8-3870K
VS
Core i3-6102E

A8-3870K vs Core i3-6102E

AMD

A8-3870K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-6102E

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-3870K is positioned at rank 502 and the Core i3-6102E is on rank 989, so the A8-3870K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3870K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7926%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7489%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5438%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1298%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1135%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
650%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
642%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
584%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
584%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
578%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
562%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
554%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
552%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
547%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
99%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
99%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
98%
#502
A8-3870K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
99%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
98%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6102E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29858%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
28213%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20485%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6171%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4276%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2449%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2417%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2201%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2201%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2176%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2117%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2088%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2079%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2061%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
98%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
100%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
98%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
98%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
98%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
98%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
97%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
96%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
94%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
93%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
91%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
90%
#1004
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-3870K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-6102E in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-3870KCore i3-6102E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-3870KCore i3-6102E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-3870K and Core i3-6102E

AMD

A8-3870K

The A8-3870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,360 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i3-6102E

The Core i3-6102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The A8-3870K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6102E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3870K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-3870K versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-6102E — a 44.9% clock advantage for the A8-3870K. The A8-3870K uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6102E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3870K scores 2,360 against the Core i3-6102E's 2,349 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-3870K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3870K vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6102E.

FeatureA8-3870KCore i3-6102E
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz+58%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,360
2,349
Geekbench 6 Single
380
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A8-3870K versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6102E — the Core i3-6102E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-6102E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3870K) vs 16 (Core i3-6102E) — the A8-3870K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA8-3870KCore i3-6102E
Socket
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A8-3870K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3870K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6102E). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6550D (A8-3870K) and HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6102E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3870K targets Budget Gaming Desktop, Core i3-6102E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A8-3870K rivals Core i3-2125.

FeatureA8-3870KCore i3-6102E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6550D
HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget Gaming Desktop
Embedded