A8-3870K
VS
Core m7-6Y75

A8-3870K vs Core m7-6Y75

AMD

A8-3870K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core m7-6Y75

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-3870K is positioned at rank 502 and the Core m7-6Y75 is on rank 1189, so the A8-3870K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3870K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7926%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7489%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5438%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1298%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1135%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
650%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
642%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
584%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
584%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
578%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
562%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
554%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
552%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
547%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
99%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
99%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
98%
#502
A8-3870K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
99%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
98%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core m7-6Y75

#1177
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4882%
#1178
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4810%
#1179
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4416%
#1180
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4396%
#1181
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4356%
#1183
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4206%
#1184
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4033%
#1185
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4027%
#1186
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3918%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
100%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
97%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
94%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
93%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
91%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
89%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
88%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
88%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
87%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
85%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core m7-6Y75 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A8-3870K in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-3870KCore m7-6Y75
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($393)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-3870KCore m7-6Y75
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($393)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-3870K and Core m7-6Y75

AMD

A8-3870K

The A8-3870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,360 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

Processing Power

The A8-3870K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m7-6Y75 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3870K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-3870K versus 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A8-3870K uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3870K scores 2,360 against the Core m7-6Y75's 2,363 — a 0.1% lead for the Core m7-6Y75. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3870K vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75.

FeatureA8-3870KCore m7-6Y75
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.1 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3 GHz+150%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark
2,360
2,363
Geekbench 6 Single
380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3870K uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-3870KCore m7-6Y75
Socket
FM1
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3870K) / not specified (Core m7-6Y75). The A8-3870K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3870K targets Budget Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3870K rivals Core i3-2125.

FeatureA8-3870KCore m7-6Y75
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6550D
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Gaming Desktop