A8-4500M vs Celeron G1630

A8-4500M vs Celeron G1630 Performance Spectrum

A8-4500M

4 / 4

1,693

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G1630

2 / 2

1,707

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-4500M vs Celeron G1630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-4500M vs Celeron G1630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-4500M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (283 vs 386).
❌Lower PassMark (1,693 vs 1,707).

Celeron G1630

2013

Why buy it

✅+36.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while A8-4500M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1630 better than A8-4500M?

Yes. Celeron G1630 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1630 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1630 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1630 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (40.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1630 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-4500M vs Celeron G1630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-4500M

The A8-4500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 1,693 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron G1630

The Celeron G1630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-4500M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G1630 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-4500M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A8-4500M versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1630 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A8-4500M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1630 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-4500M scores 1,693 against the Celeron G1630's 1,707 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G1630. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 283 vs 386, a 30.8% lead for the Celeron G1630 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-4500M vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1630.

Feature	A8-4500M	Celeron G1630
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.8 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,693	1,707
Geekbench 6 Single	283	386+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	635

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-4500M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1630 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8-4500M versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1630 — the A8-4500M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1630 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A8-4500M	Celeron G1630
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-4500M) vs VT-x (Celeron G1630). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7640G (A8-4500M) and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1630) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-4500M targets Mainstream Laptop, Celeron G1630 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-4500M rivals Core i3-3110M; Celeron G1630 rivals Pentium G2030.