
A8-5545M

Core i5-10400F
A8-5545M vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8-5545M vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8-5545M vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8-5545M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8510G, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (786 vs 5,783).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +334.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A8-5545M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while A8-5545M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5545M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than A8-5545M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-5545M vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5545M
The A8-5545M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,628 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The A8-5545M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-5545M versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 45.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A8-5545M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5545M scores 1,628 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 155.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 288 vs 1,454, a 133.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 786 vs 5,783 (152.1% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5545M vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | A8-5545M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz+59% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 1,628 | 13,029+700% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 288 | 1,454+405% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 786 | 5,783+636% |
Memory & Platform
The A8-5545M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A8-5545M versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A8-5545M) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | A8-5545M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP2 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2666+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-5545M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The A8-5545M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-5545M targets Legacy Laptop, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A8-5545M rivals Core i3-4000M; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | A8-5545M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8510G | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















