A8-5600K
VS
Core i7-920

A8-5600K vs Core i7-920

AMD

A8-5600K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-920

4 Cores8 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5600K is positioned at rank 437 and the Core i7-920 is on rank 997, so the A8-5600K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-5600K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6539%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6179%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4486%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1352%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1071%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
937%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
536%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
529%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
482%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
482%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
477%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
464%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
457%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
455%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
451%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
99%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
99%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
98%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
97%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
97%
#437
A8-5600K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
98%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
96%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
95%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-920

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
30893%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
29191%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
21195%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6385%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5058%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4425%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2534%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2501%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2277%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2277%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2252%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2191%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2160%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2152%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2132%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
100%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
100%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
96%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
94%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
93%
#1004
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
93%
#1005
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
93%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
92%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
91%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
91%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
91%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
90%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-5600K leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-920 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA8-5600KCore i7-920
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($79)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-5600KCore i7-920
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($79)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-5600K and Core i7-920

AMD

A8-5600K

The A8-5600K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,860 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i7-920

The Core i7-920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,866 points. Launch price was $340.

Processing Power

The A8-5600K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-920's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A8-5600K versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-920 — a 28.4% clock advantage for the A8-5600K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The A8-5600K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-920 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5600K scores 2,860 against the Core i7-920's 2,866 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-920. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5600K vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-920.

FeatureA8-5600KCore i7-920
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+33%
2.93 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+35%
2.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
2,860
2,866
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5600K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-920 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-5600KCore i7-920
Socket
FM2
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1866
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-5600K) / not specified (Core i7-920). The A8-5600K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7560D), while the Core i7-920 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5600K rivals Core i3-3220.

FeatureA8-5600KCore i7-920
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7560D
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true