A8-6500B vs Celeron N4120

AMD

A8-6500B

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron N4120

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

A8-6500B vs Celeron N4120 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500B vs Celeron N4120 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500B vs Celeron N4120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500B

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8570D, while Celeron N4120 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron N4120.

Trade-offs

  • 1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.

Celeron N4120

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-6500B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (2,463 vs 2,497).
  • No integrated graphics, while A8-6500B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500B.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-6500B better than Celeron N4120?
Yes. A8-6500B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, A8-6500B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-6500B is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A8-6500B still makes the most sense overall. A8-6500B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N4120 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-6500B vs Celeron N4120 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A8-6500B

The A8-6500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,497 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Celeron N4120

The Celeron N4120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,463 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the A8-6500B and Celeron N4120 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A8-6500B versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4120 — a 44.8% clock advantage for the A8-6500B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-6500B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N4120 uses Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500B scores 2,497 against the Celeron N4120's 2,463 — a 1.4% lead for the A8-6500B.

FeatureA8-6500BCeleron N4120
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+58%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+218%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
PassMark
2,497+1%
2,463
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4120 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-6500BCeleron N4120
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1866
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-6500B) / not specified (Celeron N4120). The A8-6500B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8570D), while the Celeron N4120 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500B rivals Core i3-4130.

FeatureA8-6500BCeleron N4120
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8570D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true