A8-6500B vs Core i5-4300U

A8-6500B vs Core i5-4300U Performance Spectrum

A8-6500B

4 / 4

2,497

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4300U

2 / 4

2,482

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500B vs Core i5-4300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500B vs Core i5-4300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500B

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-4300U.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4300U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-6500B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,482 vs 2,497).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500B.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-6500B better than Core i5-4300U?

Yes. A8-6500B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-6500B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-6500B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-6500B still makes the most sense overall. A8-6500B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-6500B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-6500B vs Core i5-4300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6500B

The A8-6500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,497 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-4300U

The Core i5-4300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,482 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-6500B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4300U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A8-6500B versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-4300U — a 34.3% clock advantage for the A8-6500B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A8-6500B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4300U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500B scores 2,497 against the Core i5-4300U's 2,482 — a 0.6% lead for the A8-6500B.

Feature	A8-6500B	Core i5-4300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+41%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+84%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,497	2,482
Geekbench 6 Single	—	607
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,722

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4300U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500B versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4300U — the A8-6500B supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500B supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-6500B) vs 12 (Core i5-4300U) — the A8-6500B offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500B) and HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4300U).

Feature	A8-6500B	Core i5-4300U
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (A8-6500B) vs Yes (Core i5-4300U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8570D (A8-6500B) and Intel HD Graphics 4400 (Core i5-4300U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500B rivals Core i3-4130.