
A8-7680
Popular choices:

Core i3-4340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A8-7680
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 54W, a 9W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i3-4340
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7680 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,490 vs 3,523).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while A8-7680 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 54W vs 45W.
A8-7680
2018Core i3-4340
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 54W, a 9W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7680 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,490 vs 3,523).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while A8-7680 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 54W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is A8-7680 better than Core i3-4340?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A8-7680 | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A8-7680 | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 29 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A8-7680 | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A8-7680 | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-7680 and Core i3-4340

A8-7680
A8-7680
The A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 26 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,523 points. Launch price was $56.

Core i3-4340
Core i3-4340
The Core i3-4340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,490 points. Launch price was $210.
Processing Power
The A8-7680 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4340 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7680 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4340 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the A8-7680 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A8-7680 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4340 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7680 scores 3,523 against the Core i3-4340's 3,490 — a 0.9% lead for the A8-7680.
| Feature | A8-7680 | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Excavator (2017−2018) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,523 | 3,490 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,024 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-7680 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4340 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8-7680 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4340 — the A8-7680 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7680 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A8-7680) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4340).
| Feature | A8-7680 | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133+71000% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | 32 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-7680) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4340). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7680) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4340) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4340 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-7680 rivals Core i3-4150; Core i3-4340 rivals FX-6350.
| Feature | A8-7680 | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 Graphics | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













