A8-7680
VS
Core i3-1000NG4

A8-7680 vs Core i3-1000NG4

AMD

A8-7680

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i3-1000NG4

2 Cores4 Thrd9 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-1000NG4

#611
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
831%
#612
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
819%
#613
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
752%
#614
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
748%
#615
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
742%
#617
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
716%
#618
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
687%
#619
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
686%
#620
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
667%
#623
Core i3-1000NG4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-7680 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-1000NG4 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA8-7680Core i3-1000NG4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-Y (2020) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-7680Core i3-1000NG4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-7680 and Core i3-1000NG4

AMD

A8-7680

The A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 26 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,523 points. Launch price was $56.

Intel

Core i3-1000NG4

The Core i3-1000NG4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1044. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 3,530 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A8-7680 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-1000NG4 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7680 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-1000NG4 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the A8-7680 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-7680 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-1000NG4 uses Ice Lake-Y (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7680 scores 3,523 against the Core i3-1000NG4's 3,530 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-1000NG4.

FeatureA8-7680Core i3-1000NG4
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+19%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+218%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm
10 nm-64%
Architecture
Excavator (2017−2018)
Ice Lake-Y (2020)
PassMark
3,523
3,530
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7680 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-1000NG4 uses BGA1044 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-7680Core i3-1000NG4
Socket
FM2+
BGA1044
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2133
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7680) / not specified (Core i3-1000NG4). The A8-7680 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Core i3-1000NG4 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7680 rivals Core i3-4150.

FeatureA8-7680Core i3-1000NG4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true