A8-7680 vs Core i3-1000NG4

A8-7680 vs Core i3-1000NG4 Performance Spectrum

A8-7680

4 / 4

3,523

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-1000NG4

2 / 4

3,530

+0.2%

Core i7-620M

Core 2 Duo T6670

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7680 vs Core i3-1000NG4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7680 vs Core i3-1000NG4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7680

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Core i3-1000NG4 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-1000NG4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,523 vs 3,530).
❌400% higher power demand at 45W vs 9W.

Core i3-1000NG4

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 9W instead of 45W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7680 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7680 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7680.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1000NG4 better than A8-7680?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-7680 is ahead with a 13.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1000NG4 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1000NG4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1000NG4 still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-1000NG4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1000NG4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7680 vs Core i3-1000NG4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7680

The A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 26 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,523 points. Launch price was $56.

Core i3-1000NG4

The Core i3-1000NG4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1044. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 3,530 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7680 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-1000NG4 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7680 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-1000NG4 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the A8-7680 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-7680 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-1000NG4 uses Ice Lake-Y (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7680 scores 3,523 against the Core i3-1000NG4's 3,530 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-1000NG4.

Feature	A8-7680	Core i3-1000NG4
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+218%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	10 nm-64%
Architecture	Excavator (2017−2018)	Ice Lake-Y (2020)
PassMark	3,523	3,530

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7680 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-1000NG4 uses BGA1044 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-7680	Core i3-1000NG4
Socket	FM2+	BGA1044
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7680) / not specified (Core i3-1000NG4). The A8-7680 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Core i3-1000NG4 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7680 rivals Core i3-4150.