
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Intel
PassMark
2,725
MSRP
$80
AVG Price
$10
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Overview
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is positioned at rank #638 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1400
FPS Benchmarks
Predicted performance for Celeron Dual-Core T1400 across popular games. Tested paired with RTX 4090 to isolate CPU performance.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Analysis
Detailed breakdown of Celeron Dual-Core T1400 specifications and capabilities.
Processing Power
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a 2-core / 2-thread processor based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture, manufactured on a 65 nm process node. It reaches a maximum boost clock of 1.73 GHz— higher boost clocks directly translate to better single-threaded performance and responsiveness in gaming. In the PassMark benchmark (a comprehensive multi-threaded test), it scores 2,725, placing it in the Entry Level performance tier as a Legacy generation product.
| Specification | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 |
|---|---|
| Cores / ThreadsPhysical/logical processing units | 2C / 2T |
| Max Boost ClockPeak single-core speed under boost | 1.73 GHz |
| ArchitectureCPU microarchitecture design | Merom-2M (2008) |
| Process NodeFabrication technology — smaller = more efficient | 65 nm |
| L2 CachePer-core fast cache for frequently accessed data | 512 kB |
| Bus SpeedData bus frequency | 533 MHz |
| Max TemperatureMaximum safe operating temperature (Tjmax) | 100 °C |
| 64-bit Support | Yes |
| Windows 11 Compatible | No |
| PassMark ScoreOverall multi-threaded benchmark score | 2,725 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 fits into the P socket and supports PCIe 1.1 with 0 total PCIe lanes for expansion cards and storage.
| Specification | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 |
|---|---|
| TypeDesktop or Laptop processor | Laptop |
| SeriesProduct family | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| SocketMotherboard socket required | P |
| PCIe GenerationPeripheral interconnect speed — affects GPU and SSD bandwidth | PCIe 1.1 |
| PCIe LanesTotal available lanes for GPUs, NVMe drives, and expansion | 0 |
| Max RAM SpeedMaximum officially supported memory frequency | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM CapacityMaximum installable memory | 4 GB |
| RAM ChannelsDual-channel doubles bandwidth vs single-channel | 2 |
| ECC SupportError-Correcting Code memory — prevents data corruption | No |
| Integrated GPUBuilt-in graphics processor | No |
| Compatible ChipsetsMotherboard chipsets that support this CPU | GM965,GL960 |
Advanced Features
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is primarily designed for Budget. Virtualization: No — enables running virtual machines efficiently (important for development and server workloads). Its primary market competitor is the Pentium T2370.
| Specification | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 |
|---|---|
| Primary Use CaseIntended workload category | Budget |
| OverclockingWhether CPU clock can be manually increased | 🔒 Locked |
| AVX-512Advanced vector instructions for AI/ML workloads | ❌ Not Supported |
| VirtualizationHardware-assisted virtualization technology | No |
| Direct CompetitorMarket equivalent from rival manufacturer | Pentium T2370 |
Power & Cooling
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has a rated TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 512 kB — this indicates the amount of heat generated under sustained load and determines what cooling solution is needed. No stock cooler is included — you will need to purchase an aftermarket cooler separately. Recommended cooling: Stock.
| Specification | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 |
|---|---|
| TDPThermal Design Power — heat output under sustained workload | 512 kB |
| Max TemperatureMaximum safe junction temperature (Tjmax) | 100 °C |
| Included CoolerStock cooler bundled in the box | No |
| Recommended CoolerSuggested aftermarket cooling solution | Stock |
Value Analysis
At an average price of $10 (MSRP: $80), the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 delivers 273 PassMark points per dollar. It currently holds Rank #638 in the overall cost-benefit ranking — this ranking factors in performance-per-dollar relative to all available processors. Performance ranking position: #3248 out of all indexed processors.
| Specification | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 |
|---|---|
| MSRPManufacturer's Suggested Retail Price | $80 |
| Avg Price (30d)Average market price over the last 30 days | $10 |
| Launch PriceOriginal retail price at launch | $69 |
| Cost-Benefit RankPosition in overall value ranking | #638 |
| Performance RankPosition in overall performance ranking | #3248 |
| Release DateLaunch date | 2007-01-01 |
| Release Year | 2008 |
| DesignerArchitecture designer (e.g. Intel, AMD) | Intel |
Similar Performance
Processors with benchmark scores closest to the current hardware, grouped by manufacturer.
Intel (12)












AMD (12)












Our Recommendation for Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Suggested pairings based on performance balance
Minimum (Avoid Bottleneck) (12)









Recommended (Balanced) (12)











High-End (Max Performance) (12)












Popular Comparisons
Compare Celeron Dual-Core T1400 with other popular CPUs












Compare Celeron Dual-Core T1400
See how this CPU stacks up against similar alternatives
Better Alternatives (8)
















Similar or Lower Performance (8)
















