Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i5-8210Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i5-8210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i5-8210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Core i5-8210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-8210Y

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 617, while Celeron Dual-Core T1400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,723 vs 2,725).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8210Y better than Celeron Dual-Core T1400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-8210Y is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8210Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-8210Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron Dual-Core T1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (34.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i5-8210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-8210Y

The Core i5-8210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,723 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-8210Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-8210Y — a 70.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-8210Y. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-8210Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 scores 2,725 against the Core i5-8210Y's 2,723 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Core i5-8210Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.73 GHz	3.6 GHz+108%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Merom-2M (2008)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,725	2,723
Geekbench 6 Single	—	796

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-8210Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus LPDDR3-2133 on the Core i5-8210Y — the Core i5-8210Y supports 219.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-8210Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs 10 (Core i5-8210Y) — the Core i5-8210Y offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8210Y).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Core i5-8210Y
Socket	P	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	LPDDR3-2133+220%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8210Y). The Core i5-8210Y includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 617), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget, Core i5-8210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370; Core i5-8210Y rivals Athlon 3050U.