
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Core i7-870S
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 269.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-870S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,725 vs 2,765).
- ❌524.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 82W.
Core i7-870S
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 82W instead of 512W, a 430W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-870S better than Celeron Dual-Core T1400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-870S
The Core i7-870S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,765 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-870S offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-870S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-870S — a 70.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-870S. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i7-870S uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 scores 2,725 against the Core i7-870S's 2,765 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-870S.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | Core i7-870S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.73 GHz | 3.6 GHz+108% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Merom-2M (2008) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,725 | 2,765+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-870S uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | Core i7-870S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) / not specified (Core i7-870S). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | Core i7-870S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 was priced at $80, while the Core i7-870S came in at $300. On launch pricing ($80 vs $300), Celeron Dual-Core T1400 was $220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 delivers 34.1 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-870S — making the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 the 114.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | Core i7-870S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-73% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.1+271% | 9.2 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














