Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-870S

4 Cores8 Thrd82 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $220 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 269.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-870S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (2,725 vs 2,765).
  • 524.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 82W.

Core i7-870S

2010

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 82W instead of 512W, a 430W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-870S better than Celeron Dual-Core T1400?
Yes. Core i7-870S is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-870S is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-870S is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-870S is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-870S comes in 275.0% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron Dual-Core T1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 269.6% better value on paper (34.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-870S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-870S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-870S

The Core i7-870S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,765 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-870S offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-870S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-870S — a 70.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-870S. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i7-870S uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 scores 2,725 against the Core i7-870S's 2,765 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-870S.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1400Core i7-870S
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
1.73 GHz
3.6 GHz+108%
Base Clock
2.66 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Merom-2M (2008)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
2,725
2,765+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-870S uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1400Core i7-870S
Socket
P
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) / not specified (Core i7-870S). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1400Core i7-870S
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 was priced at $80, while the Core i7-870S came in at $300. On launch pricing ($80 vs $300), Celeron Dual-Core T1400 was $220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 delivers 34.1 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-870S — making the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 the 114.8% better value option.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1400Core i7-870S
MSRP
$80-73%
$300
Performance per Dollar
34.1+271%
9.2
Release Date
2008
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.