Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400

CPU

GPU

Athlon X4 750

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 / 2

2,725

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($95 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.1 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,725 vs 2,751).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750 better than Celeron Dual-Core T1400?

Yes. Athlon X4 750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon X4 750 comes in 18.8% more expensive on MSRP at $95 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron Dual-Core T1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 17.6% better value on paper (34.1 vs 29.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — a 79.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750. The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses Merom-2M (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1400's 2,725 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4 GHz+131%	1.73 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	—
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Merom-2M (2008)
PassMark	2,751	2,725

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — the Athlon X4 750 supports 179.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750) and GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400).

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Socket	FM2	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+180%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+1500%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) vs No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400). Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	No
Target Use	Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 750 was priced at $95, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($95 vs $80), Celeron Dual-Core T1400 was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750 delivers 29.0 pts/$ vs 34.1 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 the 16.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP	$95	$80-16%
Performance per Dollar	29.0	34.1+18%
Release Date	2013	2008

Search Athlon X4 750 on Amazon

Search Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.