Athlon X4 750
VS
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400

AMD

Athlon X4 750

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 750 is positioned at rank 611 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is on rank 638, so the Athlon X4 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 750

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10764%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10171%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7385%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2225%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1762%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1542%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
883%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
871%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
793%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
793%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
784%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
763%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
753%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
750%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
743%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
99%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
97%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
96%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
100%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
99%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
98%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
98%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
97%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1400

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
99%
#626
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
861%
#627
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
849%
#628
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
779%
#629
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
776%
#630
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
769%
#632
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
742%
#633
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
712%
#634
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
711%
#635
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
691%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon X4 750 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon X4 750Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2M (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $95), it costs 89% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 841% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Athlon X4 750.
InsightAthlon X4 750Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+841%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
More affordable ($10)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 750 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400

AMD

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — a 79.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750. The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses Merom-2M (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1400's 2,725 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

FeatureAthlon X4 750Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4 GHz+131%
1.73 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Merom-2M (2008)
PassMark
2,751
2,725
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — the Athlon X4 750 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750) and GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400).

FeatureAthlon X4 750Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Socket
FM2
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+1500%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) vs No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400). Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.

FeatureAthlon X4 750Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
No
Target Use
Desktop
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon X4 750 launched at $95 MSRP, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 debuted at $80. At current prices ($95 vs $10), the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750 delivers 29.0 pts/$ vs 272.5 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 the 161.6% better value option.

FeatureAthlon X4 750Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP
$95
$80-16%
Avg Price (30d)
$95
$10-89%
Performance per Dollar
29.0
272.5+840%
Release Date
2013
2008