Athlon X4 750 vs Core i3-6157U

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i3-6157U Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-6157U

2 / 4

2,782

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i3-6157U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i3-6157U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,751 vs 2,782).
❌Launch MSRP is still $95 MSRP, while Core i3-6157U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6157U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-6157U

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Graphics 550, while Athlon X4 750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750 better than Core i3-6157U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 750 is ahead with a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6157U pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6157U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $95 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-6157U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6157U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i3-6157U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-6157U

The Core i3-6157U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6157U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-6157U — a 50% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6157U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Core i3-6157U's 2,782 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-6157U.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Core i3-6157U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,751	2,782+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6157U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6157U — the Core i3-6157U supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750) vs 12 (Core i3-6157U) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Core i3-6157U
Socket	FM2	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6157U). The Core i3-6157U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 550), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop, Core i3-6157U targets Mobile.