
Athlon X4 750

Athlon X4 850
Athlon X4 750 vs Athlon X4 850 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 750 vs Athlon X4 850 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 750 vs Athlon X4 850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 750
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,751 vs 2,756).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 35.8 PassMark/$ ($95 MSRP vs $77 MSRP).
Athlon X4 850
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $18 less on MSRP ($77 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.8 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($77 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 850 better than Athlon X4 750?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 750 vs Athlon X4 850 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750
The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X4 850
The Athlon X4 850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,756 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X4 750 and Athlon X4 850 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X4 850 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 850 uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Athlon X4 850's 2,756 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon X4 850.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon X4 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+3% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Godaveri (2014−2016) |
| PassMark | 2,751 | 2,756 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 850 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 versus DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 850 — the Athlon X4 850 supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750) and AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 850).
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon X4 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-2133+14% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop, Athlon X4 850 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon X4 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 750 was priced at $95, while the Athlon X4 850 came in at $77. On launch pricing ($95 vs $77), Athlon X4 850 was $18 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750 delivers 29.0 pts/$ vs 35.8 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 850 — making the Athlon X4 850 the 21.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon X4 850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $95 | $77-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.0 | 35.8+23% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















