Athlon PRO 3045B vs Athlon X4 750

CPU

GPU

Athlon PRO 3045B

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon X4 750

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon PRO 3045B vs Athlon X4 750 Performance Spectrum

Athlon PRO 3045B

2 / 4

2,770

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon PRO 3045B vs Athlon X4 750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon PRO 3045B vs Athlon X4 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon PRO 3045B

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Athlon X4 750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($95 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Delivers 345.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.0 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($95 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,751 vs 2,770).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 3045B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon PRO 3045B better than Athlon X4 750?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 750 is ahead with a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon PRO 3045B pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon PRO 3045B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon PRO 3045B is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon PRO 3045B comes in 348.4% more expensive on MSRP at $426 MSRP versus $95 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Athlon X4 750 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 345.3% better value on paper (29.0 vs 6.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon PRO 3045B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon PRO 3045B vs Athlon X4 750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 3045B

The Athlon PRO 3045B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,770 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon PRO 3045B packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X4 750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 3045B versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the Dali (2020−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon X4 750 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 3045B scores 2,770 against the Athlon X4 750's 2,751 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon PRO 3045B.

Feature	Athlon PRO 3045B	Athlon X4 750
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Dali (2020−2021)	Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,770	2,751

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Athlon X4 750 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon PRO 3045B versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 — the Athlon PRO 3045B supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 3045B) vs 16 (Athlon X4 750) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP5 (Athlon PRO 3045B) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750).

Feature	Athlon PRO 3045B	Athlon X4 750
Socket	FP5	FM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+29%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon PRO 3045B) / AMD-V (Athlon X4 750). The Athlon PRO 3045B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop.

Feature	Athlon PRO 3045B	Athlon X4 750
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Vega 3	—
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon PRO 3045B was priced at $426, while the Athlon X4 750 came in at $95. On launch pricing ($426 vs $95), Athlon X4 750 was $331 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 3045B delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 29.0 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 750 — making the Athlon X4 750 the 126.7% better value option.

Feature	Athlon PRO 3045B	Athlon X4 750
MSRP	$426	$95-78%
Performance per Dollar	6.5	29.0+346%
Release Date	2021	2013

Search Athlon PRO 3045B on Amazon

Search Athlon X4 750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.