
Athlon PRO 3045B

Core i7-870S
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core i7-870S Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core i7-870S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core i7-870S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon PRO 3045B
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 82W, a 67W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i7-870S needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-870S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Core i7-870S
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $126 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,765 vs 2,770).
- ❌446.7% higher power demand at 82W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 3045B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon PRO 3045B better than Core i7-870S?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core i7-870S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 3045B
The Athlon PRO 3045B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,770 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-870S
The Core i7-870S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,765 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 3045B packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-870S offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-870S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 3045B versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-870S — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-870S (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the Dali (2020−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-870S uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 3045B scores 2,770 against the Core i7-870S's 2,765 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon PRO 3045B. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 3045B vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-870S.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core i7-870S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.66 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (2020−2021) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,770 | 2,765 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-870S uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core i7-870S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
The Athlon PRO 3045B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i7-870S requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core i7-870S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon PRO 3045B was priced at $426, while the Core i7-870S came in at $300. On launch pricing ($426 vs $300), Core i7-870S was $126 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 3045B delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-870S — making the Core i7-870S the 34.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core i7-870S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $300-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 9.2+42% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















