
Athlon PRO 3045B

Core 2 Duo P8700
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core 2 Duo P8700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core 2 Duo P8700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core 2 Duo P8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon PRO 3045B
2021Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core 2 Duo P8700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,770 vs 2,805).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 15W vs 3W.
Core 2 Duo P8700
2009Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $185 less on MSRP ($241 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.6 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 15W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 3045B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo P8700 better than Athlon PRO 3045B?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core 2 Duo P8700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 3045B
The Athlon PRO 3045B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,770 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo P8700
The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 3045B packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo P8700's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 3045B versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Athlon PRO 3045B (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the Dali (2020−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 3045B scores 2,770 against the Core 2 Duo P8700's 2,805 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8700. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 3045B vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8700.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+26% | 2.53 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.53 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 3 MB+500% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (2020−2021) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,770 | 2,805+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon PRO 3045B versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — the Athlon PRO 3045B supports 125.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon PRO 3045B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 3045B) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo P8700) — the Athlon PRO 3045B offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP5 (Athlon PRO 3045B) and GM45,GS45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P8700).
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+264% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+125% | 1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon PRO 3045B) / true (Core 2 Duo P8700). The Athlon PRO 3045B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon PRO 3045B was priced at $426, while the Core 2 Duo P8700 came in at $241. On launch pricing ($426 vs $241), Core 2 Duo P8700 was $185 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 3045B delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo P8700 — making the Core 2 Duo P8700 the 56.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $241-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 11.6+78% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















