A8-7410 vs Athlon X4 750

A8-7410 vs Athlon X4 750 Performance Spectrum

A8-7410

4 / 4

2,741

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7410 vs Athlon X4 750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7410 vs Athlon X4 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7410

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5 Graphics, while Athlon X4 750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,741 vs 2,751).

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $95 MSRP, while A8-7410 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7410 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750 better than A8-7410?

Yes. Athlon X4 750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $95 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7410 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-7410 vs Athlon X4 750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7410

The A8-7410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,741 points. Launch price was $90.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-7410 and Athlon X4 750 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-7410 versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The A8-7410 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon X4 750 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7410 scores 2,741 against the Athlon X4 750's 2,751 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

Feature	A8-7410	Athlon X4 750
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	4 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+55%
L2 Cache	2048 kB	4 MB+100%
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,741	2,751
Geekbench 6 Single	1,356	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,460	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 750 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1866 memory speed. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A8-7410) vs 2 (Athlon X4 750). PCIe lanes: 8 (A8-7410) vs 16 (Athlon X4 750) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Carrizo-L SoC (A8-7410) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750).

Feature	A8-7410	Athlon X4 750
Socket	FP4	FM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A8-7410 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-7410 targets Entry-level Laptop, Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-7410 rivals Pentium N3700.