A8-7410 vs Xeon X5482

AMD

A8-7410

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X5482

4 Cores4 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

A8-7410 vs Xeon X5482 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7410 vs Xeon X5482 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7410 vs Xeon X5482: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7410

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 150W, a 148W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5 Graphics, while Xeon X5482 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,741 vs 2,755).

Xeon X5482

2007

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 7400% higher power demand at 150W vs 2W.
    • No integrated graphics, while A8-7410 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon X5482 better than A8-7410?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5482 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A8-7410 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5482 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5482 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon X5482 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X5482 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    A8-7410 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    A8-7410 vs Xeon X5482 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A8-7410

    The A8-7410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,741 points. Launch price was $90.

    Intel

    Xeon X5482

    The Xeon X5482 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,755 points. Launch price was $1,279.

    Processing Power

    Both the A8-7410 and Xeon X5482 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-7410 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5482 — a 24.6% clock advantage for the Xeon X5482 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A8-7410 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X5482 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7410 scores 2,741 against the Xeon X5482's 2,755 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5482.

    FeatureA8-7410Xeon X5482
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.5 GHz
    3.2 GHz+28%
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz
    3.2 GHz+45%
    L3 Cache
    12 MB L2 Cache
    L2 Cache
    2048 kB
    6 MB (total)+200%
    Process
    28 nm-38%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Carrizo-L (2015)
    Harpertown (2007−2008)
    PassMark
    2,741
    2,755
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,356
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    3,460
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A8-7410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5482 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureA8-7410Xeon X5482
    Socket
    FP4
    LGA771
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3L-1866
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    8
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-7410) / not specified (Xeon X5482). The A8-7410 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Xeon X5482 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-7410 targets Entry-level Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-7410 rivals Pentium N3700.

    FeatureA8-7410Xeon X5482
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Entry-level Laptop