A8-7410 vs Core i3-7100U

A8-7410 vs Core i3-7100U Performance Spectrum

A8-7410

4 / 4

2,741

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-7100U

2 / 4

2,721

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7410 vs Core i3-7100U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7410 vs Core i3-7100U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7410

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-7100U

2016

Why buy it

✅50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7410 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,721 vs 2,741).
❌650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7410 better than Core i3-7100U?

Yes. A8-7410 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7410 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7410 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7410 still makes the most sense overall. A8-7410 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7100U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-7410 vs Core i3-7100U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7410

The A8-7410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,741 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-7100U

The Core i3-7100U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,721 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7100U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-7410 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100U — a 4.1% clock advantage for the A8-7410 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A8-7410 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-7100U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7410 scores 2,741 against the Core i3-7100U's 2,721 — a 0.7% lead for the A8-7410. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,356 vs 841, a 46.9% lead for the A8-7410 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A8-7410	Core i3-7100U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,741	2,721
Geekbench 6 Single	1,356+61%	841
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,460	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7100U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the A8-7410 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-7100U — the Core i3-7100U supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A8-7410) vs 2 (Core i3-7100U). PCIe lanes: 8 (A8-7410) vs 12 (Core i3-7100U) — the Core i3-7100U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-7410	Core i3-7100U
Socket	FP4	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	12+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-7410) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100U). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R5 Graphics (A8-7410) and HD Graphics 620 (Core i3-7100U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-7410 targets Entry-level Laptop, Core i3-7100U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-7410 rivals Pentium N3700; Core i3-7100U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

Feature	A8-7410	Core i3-7100U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	HD Graphics 620
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Entry-level Laptop	Mainstream Laptop