A8-7410 vs Core m3-8100Y

A8-7410 vs Core m3-8100Y Performance Spectrum

A8-7410

4 / 4

2,741

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core m3-8100Y

2 / 4

2,767

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7410 vs Core m3-8100Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7410 vs Core m3-8100Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7410

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5 Graphics, while Core m3-8100Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,741 vs 2,767).

Core m3-8100Y

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7410 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7410 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-8100Y better than A8-7410?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-7410 is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-8100Y pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-8100Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-8100Y still makes the most sense overall. Core m3-8100Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-8100Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7410 vs Core m3-8100Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7410

The A8-7410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,741 points. Launch price was $90.

Core m3-8100Y

The Core m3-8100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,767 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-8100Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-7410 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core m3-8100Y — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Core m3-8100Y (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-7410 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core m3-8100Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7410 scores 2,741 against the Core m3-8100Y's 2,767 — a 0.9% lead for the Core m3-8100Y.

Feature	A8-7410	Core m3-8100Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+100%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,741	2,767
Geekbench 6 Single	1,356	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,460	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-8100Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-7410	Core m3-8100Y
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-7410) / not specified (Core m3-8100Y). The A8-7410 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core m3-8100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-7410 targets Entry-level Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-7410 rivals Pentium N3700.