Athlon X4 750 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2

Athlon X4 750 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-2603 v2

4 / 4

2,735

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $95 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2603 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2603 v2

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,735 vs 2,751).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750 better than Xeon E5-2603 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2603 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon X4 750 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $95 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 750 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2603 v2

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,735 points. Launch price was $240.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 750 and Xeon E5-2603 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v2 — a 75.9% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Xeon E5-2603 v2's 2,735 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Xeon E5-2603 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+122%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+89%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	2,751	2,735

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.