A10-5700 vs Athlon X4 750

A10-5700 vs Athlon X4 750 Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Athlon X4 750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Athlon X4 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Athlon X4 750 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon X4 750.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,747 vs 2,751).

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $95 MSRP, while A10-5700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750 better than A10-5700?

Yes. Athlon X4 750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $95 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5700 vs Athlon X4 750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-5700 and Athlon X4 750 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The A10-5700 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 750 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Athlon X4 750's 2,751 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

Feature	A10-5700	Athlon X4 750
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4 MB+300%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,747	2,751

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FM2 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to 1866 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-5700) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750).

Feature	A10-5700	Athlon X4 750
Socket	FM2	FM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1866	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A10-5700) vs AMD-V (Athlon X4 750). The A10-5700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.