A10-5700 vs Celeron G5905

A10-5700 vs Celeron G5905 Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G5905

2 / 2

2,760

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Celeron G5905 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Celeron G5905: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron G5905.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,747 vs 2,760).

Celeron G5905

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 58W instead of 65W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5905 better than A10-5700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5700 is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5905 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5905 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5905 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron G5905 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5905 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5700 vs Celeron G5905 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron G5905

The Celeron G5905 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,760 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G5905 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5700 has 2 more cores. The A10-5700 is built on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Celeron G5905's 2,760 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G5905. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905.

Feature	A10-5700	Celeron G5905
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	—
PassMark	2,747	2,760
Geekbench 6 Single	—	724
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,242

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G5905 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A10-5700 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5905 — the Celeron G5905 supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5905 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-5700) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5905).

Feature	A10-5700	Celeron G5905
Socket	FM2	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1866	DDR4-2666+43%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5700) vs VT-x (Celeron G5905). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5700) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5905) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220; Celeron G5905 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.