A10-5700 vs Athlon PRO 3045B

A10-5700 vs Athlon PRO 3045B Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon PRO 3045B

2 / 4

2,770

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Athlon PRO 3045B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Athlon PRO 3045B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon PRO 3045B.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,747 vs 2,770).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Athlon PRO 3045B

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while A10-5700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon PRO 3045B better than A10-5700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5700 is ahead with a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon PRO 3045B pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon PRO 3045B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon PRO 3045B is the better buy right now. Athlon PRO 3045B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $426 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10-5700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon PRO 3045B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5700 vs Athlon PRO 3045B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon PRO 3045B

The Athlon PRO 3045B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,770 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon PRO 3045B offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 3045B — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A10-5700 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon PRO 3045B uses Dali (2020−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Athlon PRO 3045B's 2,770 — a 0.8% lead for the Athlon PRO 3045B. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 3045B.

Feature	A10-5700	Athlon PRO 3045B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+48%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Dali (2020−2021)
PassMark	2,747	2,770

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon PRO 3045B uses FP5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A10-5700 versus DDR4-2400 on the Athlon PRO 3045B — the Athlon PRO 3045B supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5700) vs 8 (Athlon PRO 3045B) — the A10-5700 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-5700) and AMD FP5 (Athlon PRO 3045B).

Feature	A10-5700	Athlon PRO 3045B
Socket	FM2	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	1866	DDR4-2400+29%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5700) / not specified (Athlon PRO 3045B). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5700) and AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon PRO 3045B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.