A10-5700 vs Core i3-6157U

A10-5700 vs Core i3-6157U Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-6157U

2 / 4

2,782

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Core i3-6157U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Core i3-6157U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-6157U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,747 vs 2,782).

Core i3-6157U

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6157U better than A10-5700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5700 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6157U pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6157U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6157U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-6157U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6157U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5700 vs Core i3-6157U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-6157U

The Core i3-6157U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6157U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-6157U — a 50% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A10-5700 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6157U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Core i3-6157U's 2,782 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i3-6157U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6157U.

Feature	A10-5700	Core i3-6157U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,747	2,782+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-6157U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A10-5700 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6157U — the Core i3-6157U supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5700) vs 12 (Core i3-6157U) — the A10-5700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-5700	Core i3-6157U
Socket	FM2	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5700) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6157U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5700) and Iris Graphics 550 (Core i3-6157U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6157U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.