A10-5700 vs Xeon X3440

A10-5700 vs Xeon X3440 Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3440

4 / 8

2,769

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Xeon X3440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Xeon X3440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Xeon X3440 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Xeon X3440.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,747 vs 2,769).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X3440, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X3440

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $215 MSRP, while A10-5700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5700 better than Xeon X3440?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3440 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-5700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5700 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X3440 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A10-5700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $215 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 23 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon X3440 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon X3440 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5700 vs Xeon X3440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon X3440

The Xeon X3440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,769 points. Launch price was $215.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3440's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 2.93 GHz on the Xeon X3440 — a 30.9% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The A10-5700 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X3440 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Xeon X3440's 2,769 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon X3440. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3440.

Feature	A10-5700	Xeon X3440
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+37%	2.93 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+34%	2.53 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,747	2,769

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X3440 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5700	Xeon X3440
Socket	FM2	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5700) / not specified (Xeon X3440). The A10-5700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Xeon X3440 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.