A10-5700 vs Core i7-870S

A10-5700 vs Core i7-870S Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-870S

4 / 8

2,765

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Core i7-870S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Core i7-870S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 82W, a 17W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Core i7-870S needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i7-870S.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,747 vs 2,765).

Core i7-870S

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while A10-5700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌26.2% higher power demand at 82W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5700 better than Core i7-870S?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5700 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-870S pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-870S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5700 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-5700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-870S only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5700 vs Core i7-870S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-870S

The Core i7-870S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,765 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-870S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-870S — a 10.5% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The A10-5700 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-870S uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Core i7-870S's 2,765 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-870S. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-870S.

Feature	A10-5700	Core i7-870S
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+28%	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,747	2,765

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-870S uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5700	Core i7-870S
Socket	FM2	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5700) / not specified (Core i7-870S). The A10-5700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Core i7-870S requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.