A10-5700 vs Xeon L3426

A10-5700 vs Xeon L3426 Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L3426

2,742

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Xeon L3426 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Xeon L3426: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Xeon L3426 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Xeon L3426.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L3426 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L3426, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Xeon L3426

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,742 vs 2,747).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5700 better than Xeon L3426?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3426 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-5700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5700 still makes the most sense overall. A10-5700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5700 vs Xeon L3426 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon L3426

The Xeon L3426 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,742 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon L3426's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon L3426 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A10-5700 is built on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Xeon L3426's 2,742 — a 0.2% lead for the A10-5700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon L3426.

Feature	A10-5700	Xeon L3426
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+83%	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	—
PassMark	2,747	2,742

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L3426 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5700	Xeon L3426
Socket	FM2	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5700) / not specified (Xeon L3426). The A10-5700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Xeon L3426 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.