A10-5700
VS
Core m3-8100Y

A10-5700 vs Core m3-8100Y

AMD

A10-5700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core m3-8100Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-5700 is positioned at rank 448 and the Core m3-8100Y is on rank 383, so the Core m3-8100Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6809%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6434%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4671%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1407%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1115%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
975%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
559%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
551%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
502%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
502%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
496%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
483%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
476%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
474%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
470%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
98%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
98%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
98%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
98%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
98%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
97%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#448
A10-5700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
100%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
99%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
99%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
99%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
98%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-8100Y

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
98%
#371
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
530%
#372
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
522%
#373
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
480%
#374
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
477%
#375
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
473%
#377
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
457%
#378
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
438%
#379
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
437%
#380
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
426%
#383
Core m3-8100Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#391
Core i5-1145GRE
MSRP: $362|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core m3-8100Y (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-5700Core m3-8100Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-5700 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-5700Core m3-8100Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-5700 and Core m3-8100Y

AMD

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core m3-8100Y

The Core m3-8100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,767 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-8100Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core m3-8100Y — a 16.2% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A10-5700 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core m3-8100Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Core m3-8100Y's 2,767 — a 0.7% lead for the Core m3-8100Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 4 MB on the Core m3-8100Y.

FeatureA10-5700Core m3-8100Y
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+18%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+209%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark
2,747
2,767
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core m3-8100Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10-5700Core m3-8100Y
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1866
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5700) / not specified (Core m3-8100Y). The A10-5700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Core m3-8100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.

FeatureA10-5700Core m3-8100Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7660D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true