Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron G6900TE
Athlon X4 750
Celeron G6900TE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon X4 750 is positioned at rank #611 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 750
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900TE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X4 750 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($95) | ✅ More affordable ($64) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X4 750 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+50%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($95) | ✅ More affordable ($64) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 750 and Celeron G6900TE
Athlon X4 750
The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron G6900TE
The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G6900TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE — a 50% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G6900TE uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Celeron G6900TE's 2,782 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron G6900TE.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+67% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+220% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 10 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,751 | 2,782+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,457 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900TE uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900TE — the Celeron G6900TE supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900TE supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750) vs 20 (Celeron G6900TE) — the Celeron G6900TE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900TE).
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR5-4800+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900TE). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop, Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X4 750 launched at $95 MSRP, while the Celeron G6900TE debuted at $53. At current prices ($95 vs $64), the Celeron G6900TE is $31 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750 delivers 29.0 pts/$ vs 43.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900TE — making the Celeron G6900TE the 40.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Celeron G6900TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $95 | $53-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95 | $64-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.0 | 43.5+50% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X4 750 and Celeron G6900TE
