Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron G6900TE

CPU

GPU

Athlon X4 750

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G6900TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2022

Buy on Amazon

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron G6900TE Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G6900TE

2 / 2

2,782

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron G6900TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron G6900TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,751 vs 2,782).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 52.5 PassMark/$ ($95 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FM2, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $42 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).
✅Delivers 81.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.5 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FM2 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900TE better than Athlon X4 750?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 750 is ahead with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900TE pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900TE comes in $42 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $95 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon X4 750 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 81.3% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 29.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FM2, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Athlon X4 750 vs Celeron G6900TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G6900TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE — a 50% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G6900TE uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Celeron G6900TE's 2,782 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron G6900TE.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Celeron G6900TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+220%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	2,751	2,782+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,400
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,457

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900TE uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900TE — the Celeron G6900TE supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900TE supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750) vs 20 (Celeron G6900TE) — the Celeron G6900TE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900TE).

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Celeron G6900TE
Socket	FM2	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR5-4800+157%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900TE). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop, Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Celeron G6900TE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 710
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 750 was priced at $95, while the Celeron G6900TE came in at $53. On launch pricing ($95 vs $53), Celeron G6900TE was $42 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750 delivers 29.0 pts/$ vs 52.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900TE — making the Celeron G6900TE the 57.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Celeron G6900TE
MSRP	$95	$53-44%
Performance per Dollar	29.0	52.5+81%
Release Date	2013	2022

Search Athlon X4 750 on Amazon

Search Celeron G6900TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.