Athlon X4 850 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Athlon X4 850

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Athlon X4 850

4 / 4

2,756

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 / 2

2,725

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 850 is positioned at rank 539 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is on rank 638, so the Athlon X4 850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 850

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

8710%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

8230%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

5975%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

1800%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

1426%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

1247%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

714%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

705%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

642%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

642%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

635%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

618%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

609%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

607%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

601%

#376

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399

99%

#377

Core i3-9100HL

MSRP: $225|Avg: $100

97%

#378

Core i9-12900TE

MSRP: $494|Avg: $664

96%

#539

Athlon X4 850

MSRP: $77|Avg: $20

100%

#541

FX-6350

MSRP: $132|Avg: $55

98%

#542

Celeron G470

MSRP: $35|Avg: $10

98%

#543

Pentium G3220

MSRP: $54|Avg: $15

98%

#545

Athlon 5370

MSRP: $55|Avg: $15

97%

#548

Core i3-6100

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

95%

#549

Core i3-6300T

MSRP: $117|Avg: $15

95%

#550

Core i3-6098P

MSRP: $117|Avg: $59

95%

#551

Core i7-7800X

MSRP: $383|Avg: $254

95%

#552

Core i3-7101TE

MSRP: $117|Avg: $60

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1400

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

99%

#188

Core i7-10870H

MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A

99%

#626

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

861%

#627

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

849%

#628

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

779%

#629

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

776%

#630

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

769%

#632

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

742%

#633

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

712%

#634

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

711%

#635

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

691%

#638

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

100%

#650

Core i5-1345UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon X4 850 (2015) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Athlon X4 850	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($20)	✅ More affordable ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Merom-2M (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Athlon X4 850	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+98%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($20)	✅ More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Athlon X4 850 Benchmark Check

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 850 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Athlon X4 850

The Athlon X4 850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,756 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X4 850 versus 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — a 77.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 850. The Athlon X4 850 uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses Merom-2M (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 850 scores 2,756 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1400's 2,725 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon X4 850.

Feature	Athlon X4 850	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+125%	1.73 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Merom-2M (2008)
PassMark	2,756+1%	2,725

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 850 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 850 versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — the Athlon X4 850 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 850 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 850) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) — the Athlon X4 850 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 850) and GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400).

Feature	Athlon X4 850	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Socket	FM2+	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+50%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+1500%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 850 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 850) vs No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400). Primary use case: Athlon X4 850 targets Desktop, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.

Feature	Athlon X4 850	Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	No
Target Use	Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon X4 850 launched at $77 MSRP, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 debuted at $80. At current prices ($20 vs $10), the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 850 delivers 137.8 pts/$ vs 272.5 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 the 65.7% better value option.