Athlon X4 850 vs Celeron G5905

Athlon X4 850 vs Celeron G5905 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 850

4 / 4

2,756

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G5905

2 / 2

2,760

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 850 vs Celeron G5905 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 850 vs Celeron G5905: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 850

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,756 vs 2,760).
❌Launch MSRP is still $77 MSRP, while Celeron G5905 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5905 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G5905

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 58W instead of 65W, a 7W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Athlon X4 850 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 850 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5905 better than Athlon X4 850?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 850 is ahead with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5905 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5905 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5905 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron G5905 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $77 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. Athlon X4 850 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5905 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 850 vs Celeron G5905 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 850

The Athlon X4 850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,756 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron G5905

The Celeron G5905 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,760 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G5905 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 850 has 2 more cores. The Athlon X4 850 is built on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon X4 850 scores 2,756 against the Celeron G5905's 2,760 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G5905.

Feature	Athlon X4 850	Celeron G5905
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	—	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	4 MB	—
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	—
PassMark	2,756	2,760
Geekbench 6 Single	—	724
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,242

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 850 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5905 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 850 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5905 — the Celeron G5905 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5905 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 850) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5905).

Feature	Athlon X4 850	Celeron G5905
Socket	FM2+	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	DDR4-2666+25%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 850 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 850) vs VT-x (Celeron G5905). The Celeron G5905 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Athlon X4 850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 850 targets Desktop, Celeron G5905 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.