Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-4600U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-4600U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-4600U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Core i7-4600U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-4600U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,720 vs 2,725).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T1400 better than Core i7-4600U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4600U is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core T1400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4600U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4600U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Core i7-4600U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-4600U

The Core i7-4600U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,720 points. Launch price was $398.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-4600U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4600U — a 62.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-4600U. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i7-4600U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 scores 2,725 against the Core i7-4600U's 2,720 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Core i7-4600U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.73 GHz	3.3 GHz+91%
Base Clock	—	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	Merom-2M (2008)	Haswell-ULT (2013)
PassMark	2,725	2,720

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-4600U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Core i7-4600U
Socket	P	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) / not specified (Core i7-4600U). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.