Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Celeron G4950

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Celeron G4950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Celeron G4950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.1 vs 52.2 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G4950

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $28 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.2 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Celeron Dual-Core T1400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,714 vs 2,725).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4950 better than Celeron Dual-Core T1400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4950 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4950 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4950 comes in $28 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 53.2% better value on MSRP (52.2 vs 34.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Celeron G4950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron G4950 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 — a 62.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G4950. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron G4950 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 scores 2,725 against the Celeron G4950's 2,714 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Celeron G4950
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.73 GHz	3.3 GHz+91%
Base Clock	—	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Merom-2M (2008)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	2,725	2,714
Geekbench 6 Single	—	672
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,229

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G4950 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4950 — the Celeron G4950 supports 259.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs 16 (Celeron G4950) — the Celeron G4950 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4950).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Celeron G4950
Socket	P	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR4-2400+260%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	64 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs VT-x (Celeron G4950). The Celeron G4950 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget, Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370; Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Celeron G4950
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 was priced at $80, while the Celeron G4950 came in at $52. On launch pricing ($80 vs $52), Celeron G4950 was $28 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 delivers 34.1 pts/$ vs 52.2 pts/$ for the Celeron G4950 — making the Celeron G4950 the 42% better value option.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Celeron G4950
MSRP	$80	$52-35%
Performance per Dollar	34.1	52.2+53%
Release Date	2008	2019

Search Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on Amazon

Search Celeron G4950 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.