Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Athlon X4 750

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008

Athlon X4 750

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 / 2

2,725

0.0%

2,751

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is positioned at rank 638 and the Athlon X4 750 is on rank 611, so the Athlon X4 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1400

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

99%

#188

Core i7-10870H

MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A

99%

#626

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

861%

#627

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

849%

#628

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

779%

#629

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

776%

#630

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

769%

#632

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

742%

#633

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

712%

#634

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

711%

#635

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

691%

#638

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

100%

#650

Core i5-1345UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 750

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

10764%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

10171%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

7385%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

2225%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

1762%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

1542%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

883%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

871%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

793%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

793%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

784%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

763%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

753%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

750%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

743%

#280

Core i7-7820X

MSRP: $599|Avg: $198

99%

#383

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999

98%

#384

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850

97%

#385

Celeron G4900

MSRP: $42|Avg: $85

96%

#611

Athlon X4 750

MSRP: $95|Avg: $95

100%

#613

A6-3600

MSRP: $95|Avg: $25

99%

#614

Core i7-7740X

MSRP: $339|Avg: $150

99%

#615

Core i3-4130

MSRP: $117|Avg: $55

98%

#617

Pentium G3250T

MSRP: $64|Avg: $30

98%

#619

Core i5-7640X

MSRP: $249|Avg: $85

98%

#620

Athlon II X3 425e

MSRP: $79|Avg: $58

98%

#621

Athlon II X4 640

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

98%

#622

Celeron G540

MSRP: $42|Avg: $10

97%

#624

Core i5-4590

MSRP: $192|Avg: $51

97%

#625

Celeron G440

MSRP: $37|Avg: $5

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon X4 750 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Athlon X4 750
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($10)	⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Merom-2M (2008) / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $95), it costs 89% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 841% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Athlon X4 750.

Insight	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Athlon X4 750
Cost Efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+841%)	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($10)	⚠️ Higher cost ($95)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 Benchmark Check

Athlon X4 750 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon X4 750

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon X4 750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 — a 79.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon X4 750 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 scores 2,725 against the Athlon X4 750's 2,751 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Athlon X4 750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.73 GHz	4 GHz+131%
Base Clock	—	3.4 GHz
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB+700%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Merom-2M (2008)	Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,725	2,751

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon X4 750 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 — the Athlon X4 750 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs 16 (Athlon X4 750) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Athlon X4 750
Socket	P	FM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR3-1866+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	64 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs AMD-V (Athlon X4 750). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget, Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	Athlon X4 750
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	AMD-V
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 750 debuted at $95. At current prices ($10 vs $95), the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 delivers 272.5 pts/$ vs 29.0 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 750 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 the 161.6% better value option.