Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs A8-7410
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
A8-7410
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is positioned at rank 638 and the A8-7410 is on rank 494, so the A8-7410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Performance Per Dollar A8-7410
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | A8-7410 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom-2M (2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | A8-7410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and A8-7410
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.
A8-7410
The A8-7410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,741 points. Launch price was $90.
Processing Power
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-7410 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus 2.5 GHz on the A8-7410 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the A8-7410. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the A8-7410 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 scores 2,725 against the A8-7410's 2,741 — a 0.6% lead for the A8-7410.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | A8-7410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.73 GHz | 2.5 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2048 kB+300% |
| Process | 65 nm | 28 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Merom-2M (2008) | Carrizo-L (2015) |
| PassMark | 2,725 | 2,741 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,356 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,460 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A8-7410 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus DDR3L-1866 on the A8-7410 — the A8-7410 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7410 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs 1 (A8-7410). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs 8 (A8-7410) — the A8-7410 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) and Carrizo-L SoC (A8-7410).
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | A8-7410 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3L-1866+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) vs AMD-V (A8-7410). The A8-7410 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget, A8-7410 targets Entry-level Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370; A8-7410 rivals Pentium N3700.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1400 | A8-7410 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Entry-level Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and A8-7410
