Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs PRO A12-9800B

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs PRO A12-9800B Performance Spectrum

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 / 2

2,725

+0.7%

2,705

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs PRO A12-9800B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs PRO A12-9800B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while PRO A12-9800B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

PRO A12-9800B

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,705 vs 2,725).

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A12-9800B better than Celeron Dual-Core T1400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A12-9800B is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A12-9800B is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A12-9800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron Dual-Core T1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (34.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A12-9800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs PRO A12-9800B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A12-9800B

The PRO A12-9800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,705 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the PRO A12-9800B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-9800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 versus 3.6 GHz on the PRO A12-9800B — a 70.2% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800B. The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the PRO A12-9800B uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 scores 2,725 against the PRO A12-9800B's 2,705 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	PRO A12-9800B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.73 GHz	3.6 GHz+108%
Base Clock	—	2.7 GHz
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	65 nm	28 nm-57%
Architecture	Merom-2M (2008)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,725	2,705

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the PRO A12-9800B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1400	PRO A12-9800B
Socket	P	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400) / not specified (PRO A12-9800B). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.