A8-7680
VS
Core i7-2657M

A8-7680 vs Core i7-2657M

AMD

A8-7680

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i7-2657M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2657M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#256
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
420%
#257
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
414%
#258
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
380%
#259
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
378%
#260
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
375%
#262
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
362%
#263
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
347%
#264
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
347%
#265
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
337%
#268
Core i7-2657M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A8-7680 (2018) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA8-7680Core i7-2657M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2657M (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA8-7680Core i7-2657M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-7680 and Core i7-2657M

AMD

A8-7680

The A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 26 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,523 points. Launch price was $56.

Intel

Core i7-2657M

The Core i7-2657M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,491 points. Launch price was $317.

Processing Power

The A8-7680 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2657M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7680 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i7-2657M — a 33.8% clock advantage for the A8-7680 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A8-7680 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-2657M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7680 scores 3,523 against the Core i7-2657M's 3,491 — a 0.9% lead for the A8-7680.

FeatureA8-7680Core i7-2657M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+41%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+119%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Excavator (2017−2018)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,523
3,491
Geekbench 6 Single
535
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7680 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2657M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8-7680 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2657M — the A8-7680 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7680 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A8-7680) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2657M).

FeatureA8-7680Core i7-2657M
Socket
FM2+
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
2133+71000%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64
8 GB+13107100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-7680) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2657M). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7680) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2657M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2657M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: A8-7680 rivals Core i3-4150; Core i7-2657M rivals A6-3420M.

FeatureA8-7680Core i7-2657M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Graphics
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook