
A9-9420

Core i3-2340UE
A9-9420 vs Core i3-2340UE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A9-9420 vs Core i3-2340UE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A9-9420 vs Core i3-2340UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A9-9420
2016Why buy it
- β +116.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β Delivers 32.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (1,538 vs 1,545).
Core i3-2340UE
2011Why buy it
- β +0.5% higher PassMark.
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (230 vs 497).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 10.3 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is A9-9420 better than Core i3-2340UE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A9-9420 vs Core i3-2340UE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A9-9420
The A9-9420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,538 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-2340UE
The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The A9-9420 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2340UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A9-9420 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE β a 93.9% clock advantage for the A9-9420. The A9-9420 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016β2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-2340UE uses Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9420 scores 1,538 against the Core i3-2340UE's 1,545 β a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-2340UE. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 497 vs 230, a 73.5% lead for the A9-9420 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9420 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2340UE.
| Feature | A9-9420 | Core i3-2340UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+177% | 1.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | β |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total) | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (2016β2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) |
| PassMark | 1,538 | 1,545 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 497+116% | 230 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 950 | β |
Memory & Platform
The A9-9420 uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2340UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9420 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2340UE β the A9-9420 supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2340UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9420) vs 2 (Core i3-2340UE). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9420) vs 16 (Core i3-2340UE) β the Core i3-2340UE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9420) and HM65,QM67 (Core i3-2340UE).
| Feature | A9-9420 | Core i3-2340UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT4 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+60% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A9-9420) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE). Both include integrated graphics β Radeon R5 (A9-9420) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2340UE) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9420 targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A9-9420 rivals Pentium N4200; Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series.
| Feature | A9-9420 | Core i3-2340UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A9-9420 was priced at $150, while the Core i3-2340UE came in at $200. On launch pricing ($150 vs $200), A9-9420 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A9-9420 delivers 10.3 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-2340UE β making the A9-9420 the 28.1% better value option.
| Feature | A9-9420 | Core i3-2340UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-25% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3+34% | 7.7 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















