A9-9420
VS
Core i3-2340UE

A9-9420 vs Core i3-2340UE

AMD

A9-9420

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i3-2340UE

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A9-9420 is positioned at rank 1074 and the Core i3-2340UE is on rank 1137, so the A9-9420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A9-9420

#1062
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2862%
#1063
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2820%
#1064
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2589%
#1065
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2578%
#1066
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2554%
#1068
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2466%
#1069
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2365%
#1070
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2361%
#1071
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2298%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
98%
#1081
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
97%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2340UE

#1125
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3796%
#1126
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3740%
#1127
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3433%
#1128
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3418%
#1129
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3387%
#1131
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3270%
#1132
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3136%
#1133
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3131%
#1134
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3047%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
100%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
99%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
98%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
96%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A9-9420 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-2340UE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA9-9420Core i3-2340UE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the A9-9420 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 85% cheaper ($30 vs $200) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightA9-9420Core i3-2340UE
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+564%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A9-9420 and Core i3-2340UE

AMD

A9-9420

The A9-9420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,538 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-2340UE

The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The A9-9420 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2340UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A9-9420 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE — a 93.9% clock advantage for the A9-9420. The A9-9420 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-2340UE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9420 scores 1,538 against the Core i3-2340UE's 1,545 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-2340UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 497 vs 230, a 73.5% lead for the A9-9420 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9420 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2340UE.

FeatureA9-9420Core i3-2340UE
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+177%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,538
1,545
Geekbench 6 Single
497+116%
230
Geekbench 6 Multi
950
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A9-9420 uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2340UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9420 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2340UE — the A9-9420 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2340UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9420) vs 2 (Core i3-2340UE). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9420) vs 16 (Core i3-2340UE) — the Core i3-2340UE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9420) and HM65,QM67 (Core i3-2340UE).

FeatureA9-9420Core i3-2340UE
Socket
FT4
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A9-9420) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R5 (A9-9420) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2340UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9420 targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A9-9420 rivals Pentium N4200; Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series.

FeatureA9-9420Core i3-2340UE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The A9-9420 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i3-2340UE debuted at $200. At current prices ($30 vs $200), the A9-9420 is $170 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A9-9420 delivers 51.3 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-2340UE — making the A9-9420 the 147.6% better value option.

FeatureA9-9420Core i3-2340UE
MSRP
$150-25%
$200
Avg Price (30d)
$30-85%
$200
Performance per Dollar
51.3+566%
7.7
Release Date
2016
2011