A9-9420e vs Celeron N3350

A9-9420e vs Celeron N3350 Performance Spectrum

A9-9420e

2 / 2

1,101

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N3350

2 / 2

1,112

+1.0%

Pentium D 830

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A9-9420e vs Celeron N3350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A9-9420e vs Celeron N3350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A9-9420e

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 6W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,101 vs 1,112).

Celeron N3350

2016

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while A9-9420e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌500% higher power demand at 6W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A9-9420e better than Celeron N3350?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A9-9420e is ahead with 4.2% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3350 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A9-9420e is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A9-9420e comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.2% higher max boost clock. Celeron N3350 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A9-9420e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A9-9420e vs Celeron N3350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A9-9420e

The A9-9420e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,101 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A9-9420e and Celeron N3350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A9-9420e versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the A9-9420e. The A9-9420e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N3350 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9420e scores 1,101 against the Celeron N3350's 1,112 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N3350.

Feature	A9-9420e	Celeron N3350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark	1,101	1,112
Geekbench 6 Single	—	250
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	450

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A9-9420e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3350 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A9-9420e versus LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 — the Celeron N3350 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A9-9420e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9420e) vs 2 (Celeron N3350). PCIe lanes: 4 (A9-9420e) vs 6 (Celeron N3350) — the Celeron N3350 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT4,FP4 (A9-9420e) and SoC (Celeron N3350).

Feature	A9-9420e	Celeron N3350
Socket	BGA	FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	LPDDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	6+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A9-9420e) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A9-9420e) and Intel HD Graphics 500 (Celeron N3350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: A9-9420e rivals Pentium N4200; Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

Feature	A9-9420e	Celeron N3350
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R5 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Entry Level Laptop/NUC