CPU
GPU
Arc B580
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc B580
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc B580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 103% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+103%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-103%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 Battlemage / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (272mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $249 for the Arc B580, it costs 70% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 63.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+63.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B580 and GeForce GTX 1650
Arc B580
The Arc B580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 13 2024. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2670 MHz to 2670 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,977 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc B580 scores 15,977 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Arc B580 leads by 103%. The Arc B580 is built on Xe2 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Arc B580) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 13.67 TFLOPS (Arc B580) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2670 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,977+103% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+186% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.67 TFLOPS+358% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2670 MHz+60% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+186% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 5 MB+468% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+1700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc B580 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Arc B580 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 456 GB/s (Arc B580) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 256.3% advantage for the Arc B580. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B580) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc B580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 456 GB/s+256% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+1700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B580) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe2 Media Engine (Arc B580) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe2 Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Arc B580) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe2 Media Engine | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Xe2 Media Engine | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B580 draws 190W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 86.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B580) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 272mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 75W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 300W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 272mm | 229mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.1 | 104.9+25% |
Value Analysis
The Arc B580 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 69.9% less ($174 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.2 (Arc B580) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 63.4% better value. The Arc B580 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc B580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $149-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249 | $75-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2 | 104.9+63% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | TU117 |
| Release | December 13 2024 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #132 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc B580 and GeForce GTX 1650
