Arc B580
Quadro P6000
Arc B580 vs Quadro P6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc B580 vs Quadro P6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc B580 vs Quadro P6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc B580
2024Why buy it
- ✅8.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2381.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 Battlemage on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 250W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅95.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2309.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 190W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc B580 vs Quadro P6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc B580
The Arc B580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 13 2024. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2670 MHz to 2670 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,977 points. Launch price was $249.
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B580 scores 15,977 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B580 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Arc B580) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 13.67 TFLOPS (Arc B580) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 2670 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,977+3% | 15,512 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.67 TFLOPS+8% | 12.63 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2670 MHz+62% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 5 MB+257% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+500% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc B580 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 carries 23 GB. Quadro P6000 gives you 95.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 456 GB/s (Arc B580) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 5.6% advantage for the Arc B580. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Arc B580 and 384-bit on the Quadro P6000. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B580) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Arc B580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 23.438 GB+95% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 456 GB/s+6% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B580) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe2 Media Engine (Arc B580) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: Xe2 Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Arc B580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe2 Media Engine | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe2 Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B580 draws 190W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 27.3% difference. The Arc B580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B580) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 272mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-24% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 272mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.1+36% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc B580 came in at $249, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. On MSRP, Arc B580 was 95.8% cheaper ($5750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B580) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the Arc B580 offers 2369.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc B580 (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $5999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+2369% | 2.6 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GP102 |
| Release | December 13 2024 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #132 | #141 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc B580 and Quadro P6000
