
Arc B580
Popular choices:

Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B580
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2381.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 Battlemage on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 250W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅95.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2309.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 190W.
Arc B580
2024Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2381.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 Battlemage on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 250W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅95.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2309.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 190W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc B580 better than Quadro P6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 72 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 575 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 575 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B580 and Quadro P6000

Arc B580
Arc B580
The Arc B580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 13 2024. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2670 MHz to 2670 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,977 points. Launch price was $249.

Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B580 scores 15,977 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B580 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Arc B580) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 13.67 TFLOPS (Arc B580) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 2670 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,977+3% | 15,512 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.67 TFLOPS+8% | 12.63 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2670 MHz+62% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 5 MB+257% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+500% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc B580 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 95.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 456 GB/s (Arc B580) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 5.6% advantage for the Arc B580. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B580) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Arc B580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 23.438 GB+95% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 456 GB/s+6% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B580) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe2 Media Engine (Arc B580) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: Xe2 Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Arc B580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe2 Media Engine | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe2 Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B580 draws 190W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 27.3% difference. The Arc B580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B580) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 272mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-24% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 272mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.1+36% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B580 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. The Arc B580 costs 95.8% less ($5750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B580) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the Arc B580 offers 2369.2% better value. The Arc B580 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc B580 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $5999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+2369% | 2.6 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GP102 |
| Release | December 13 2024 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #132 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













