Athlon 64 FX-72
VS
A6-7470K

Athlon 64 FX-72 vs A6-7470K

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-72

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2006
VS
AMD

A6-7470K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-72 is positioned at rank 1100 and the A6-7470K is on rank 595, so the A6-7470K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-72

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
138540%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
130907%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
95049%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
28634%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
22681%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
19842%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
11364%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
11216%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
10212%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
10212%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
10097%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
9825%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
9688%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
9648%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
9561%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
100%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
96%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
93%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
87%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
85%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
83%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
81%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
80%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
75%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
70%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
65%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
64%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
62%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
56%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
56%
#1115
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
56%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7470K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10397%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9825%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7133%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2149%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1702%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1489%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
853%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
842%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
766%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
766%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
758%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
737%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
727%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
724%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
718%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#595
A6-7470K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
100%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
99%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
99%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
98%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
98%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-7470K (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-72A6-7470K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 FX-72 (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-72A6-7470K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-72 and A6-7470K

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-72

The Athlon 64 FX-72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,794 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

A6-7470K

The A6-7470K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 FX-72 and A6-7470K share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-72 versus 4 GHz on the A6-7470K — a 35.3% clock advantage for the A6-7470K. The Athlon 64 FX-72 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the A6-7470K uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-72 scores 1,794 against the A6-7470K's 1,799 — a 0.3% lead for the A6-7470K.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-72A6-7470K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
4 GHz+43%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1024 kB
Process
90 nm
28 nm-69%
Architecture
Windsor (2006−2007)
Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark
1,794
1,799
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-72 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-7470K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 FX-72 versus 2133 on the A6-7470K — the A6-7470K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7470K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 FX-72) vs 16 (A6-7470K) — the A6-7470K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD F (1207) (Athlon 64 FX-72) and FM2+ (A6-7470K).

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-72A6-7470K
Socket
F
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
2133+106550%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+52428700%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 FX-72) / true (A6-7470K). The A6-7470K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon 64 FX-72 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7470K rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-72A6-7470K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true