Athlon 64 X2 5400+ vs Core i5-4302Y

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ vs Core i5-4302Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 5400+

2 / 2

1,585

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4302Y

2 / 4

1,580

0.0%

Pentium D 940

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Pentium Dual Core T4300

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ vs Core i5-4302Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ vs Core i5-4302Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 89W instead of 512W, a 423W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Core i5-4302Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4302Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-4302Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4200, while Athlon 64 X2 5400+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,580 vs 1,585).
❌475.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 89W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 5400+ better than Core i5-4302Y?

Yes. Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 26 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 X2 5400+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $485 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4302Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ vs Core i5-4302Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+

The Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,585 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-4302Y

The Core i5-4302Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,580 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 5400+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4302Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4302Y — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5400+. The Athlon 64 X2 5400+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i5-4302Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ scores 1,585 against the Core i5-4302Y's 1,580 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5400+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4302Y.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5400+	Core i5-4302Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+22%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	90 nm	22 nm-76%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,585	1,580
Geekbench 6 Single	—	676
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,086

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5400+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-4302Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ versus DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4302Y — the Core i5-4302Y supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5400+) vs 12 (Core i5-4302Y) — the Core i5-4302Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5400+) and HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4302Y).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5400+	Core i5-4302Y
Socket	AM2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600+100%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5400+) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-4302Y). The Core i5-4302Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4302Y targets Productivity.