
Athlon Gold 3150G

Core i7-6700T
Athlon Gold 3150G vs Core i7-6700T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Gold 3150G vs Core i7-6700T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Gold 3150G vs Core i7-6700T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Gold 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 199.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.2 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i7-6700T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,922 vs 6,994).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i7-6700T
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 69.2 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-6700T better than Athlon Gold 3150G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Gold 3150G vs Core i7-6700T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold 3150G
The Athlon Gold 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,922 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-6700T
The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-6700T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold 3150G versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T — a 8% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon Gold 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i7-6700T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold 3150G scores 6,922 against the Core i7-6700T's 6,994 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-6700T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold 3150G vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700T.
| Feature | Athlon Gold 3150G | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+25% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 6,922 | 6,994+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6700T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Gold 3150G | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
The Athlon Gold 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i7-6700T requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon Gold 3150G | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Gold 3150G was priced at $100, while the Core i7-6700T came in at $303. On launch pricing ($100 vs $303), Athlon Gold 3150G was $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold 3150G delivers 69.2 pts/$ vs 23.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-6700T — making the Athlon Gold 3150G the 100% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Gold 3150G | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $303 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.2+200% | 23.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















