Athlon Gold 3150U vs Core i7-2675QM

Athlon Gold 3150U vs Core i7-2675QM Performance Spectrum

Athlon Gold 3150U

2 / 4

3,923

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-2675QM

4 / 8

3,913

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Gold 3150U vs Core i7-2675QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Gold 3150U vs Core i7-2675QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Gold 3150U

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2675QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i7-2675QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,913 vs 3,923).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Athlon Gold 3150U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold 3150U better than Core i7-2675QM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2675QM is ahead with a 12.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold 3150U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i7-2675QM also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold 3150U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Gold 3150U is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Athlon Gold 3150U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Core i7-2675QM only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold 3150U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Gold 3150U vs Core i7-2675QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold 3150U

The Athlon Gold 3150U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,923 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-2675QM

The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold 3150U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2675QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2675QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon Gold 3150U versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold 3150U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon Gold 3150U uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2675QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold 3150U scores 3,923 against the Core i7-2675QM's 3,913 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon Gold 3150U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold 3150U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2675QM.

Feature	Athlon Gold 3150U	Core i7-2675QM
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+6%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+9%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Dali (Zen) (2020)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,923	3,913

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold 3150U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2675QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon Gold 3150U versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2675QM — the Athlon Gold 3150U supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon Gold 3150U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold 3150U) vs 16 (Core i7-2675QM) — the Core i7-2675QM offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Athlon Gold 3150U	Core i7-2675QM
Socket	FP5	FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold 3150U) / VT-x (Core i7-2675QM). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon Gold 3150U) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2675QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile.