
Athlon Gold 7220U

Xeon E5645
Athlon Gold 7220U vs Xeon E5645 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Gold 7220U vs Xeon E5645 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Gold 7220U vs Xeon E5645: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Gold 7220U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1366 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E5645 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,904 vs 4,942).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5645, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon E5645
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Athlon Gold 7220U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1366, while Athlon Gold 7220U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold 7220U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5645 better than Athlon Gold 7220U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Gold 7220U vs Xeon E5645 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold 7220U
The Athlon Gold 7220U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,904 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5645
The Xeon E5645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,942 points. Launch price was $294.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold 7220U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5645 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5645 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Athlon Gold 7220U versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon E5645 — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold 7220U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon Gold 7220U uses the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5645 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold 7220U scores 4,904 against the Xeon E5645's 4,942 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5645. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold 7220U vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5645.
| Feature | Athlon Gold 7220U | Xeon E5645 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+39% | 2.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-81% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 4,904 | 4,942 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold 7220U uses the FT6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5645 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5500 on the Athlon Gold 7220U versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon E5645 — the Athlon Gold 7220U supports 312.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5645 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Gold 7220U) vs 3 (Xeon E5645). PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon Gold 7220U) vs 0 (Xeon E5645) — the Athlon Gold 7220U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon Gold 7220U | Xeon E5645 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT6 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5500+313% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 288 GB+1700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon Gold 7220U) vs VT-x (Xeon E5645). The Athlon Gold 7220U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon E5645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5645 targets Server. Direct competitor: Athlon Gold 7220U rivals Core i3-1115G4.
| Feature | Athlon Gold 7220U | Xeon E5645 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















